The Biden/Palin marriage debate

Blog entry - October 3rd, 2008

Not to overly h/t to Pam on here, but she has a great analysis of the Biden/Palin analysis over the Blend.

Pam's analysis is poignant for two particular reasons.

It illustrates how Biden's answer and Palin's answer--although agreeing in text--illustrates a difference in intent and ultimately execution of policy if elected to office.
It opens the door for strategic follow-up. The particular question Pam suggests is:

"Exactly which benefits should be denied to same-sex couples on that continuum between hospital visitation rights, legal contracts that they approve of and full-blown civil marriage?"

Now that's a question I want an answer to.

Comments

I dont see any reason why

Submitted by akshay_blizz on December 18, 2009 - 7:05am.

I dont see any reason why one should be against same sex marriage? I do not support this idea sorry ! Book App

This is a problem that will

Submitted by funlol on November 23, 2009 - 8:35pm.

This is a problem that will never be settled unless every man and woman in this country vote on it. Otherwise, any decision our leaders take, there will always be an unhappy group.

auto insurance

It includes both facts and

Submitted by rock0987 on December 20, 2009 - 7:52am.

It includes both facts and myths of weight loss to explain why the conventional advice has kept the fat.To find a menu that 4 meals per day, which must occur by the method of heat transfer. One should not think, just follow the menu. Therefore, it is called the fat loss 4 Idiots, because you do yourself a fool.TheFat burning furnacebook is of great information that all you need to know to finally the place you get full cover.

This is a problem that will

Submitted by johannabartley on February 5, 2009 - 3:01pm.

This is a problem that will never be settled unless every man and woman in this country vote on it. Otherwise, any decision our leaders take, there will always be an unhappy group.

___________

marriage counselor